What additional KPA would you add to the list of 12?

[Robert Collins]

There is nothing substantive in any of the answers above. If this was meant to be a gatekeeper excercise, any input will suffice. If I had the material in front of me and could read I might recommends several KPIs to include.

[Peggy Garrett]

Seems pretty comprehensive.

[Chrisdan CRowe]

I don’t believe any additional KPAs need to be added to the list.

[Zach Downey]

12 KPAs seem inclusive.

[C. Alex Juarez]

My team is currently reviewing the KPAs and integrating into our hardware and software standards. Currently, we feel these are sufficient and comprehensive and have no additional suggestions.

[David Arnett]

NO additional KPA’s at this point but I believe comms is key

[Khaleed Sungay]

Environmental

[Catalina Gavris]

There are no additions I would make. I think 12 is sufficient for now.

[Nicole McMartin]

I don’t know

[Don Wall]

Procurement mgt

[Brian Minger]

I build my document retention and workflows around the 12. I have always been able to find where my work should be filed, keep, etc., with the 12 KPA’s provided. I cannot think of any additional areas that need to be added.

[Robert Byrd]

The 12 KPA’s appear to be enough for a comprehensive program.

[Sara Adams]

I think the 12 KPA’s are sufficient.

[Darnell Sadler]

12 is enough

[Sherrin Richards]

People Management

[Author]

Posts