If your organization took the ITAM360 Assessment, what rating do you expect it would get for each KPA?

[Brian Minger]

Very low ratings since we do not have a centralized program. There is no Program aligned with IBPL in my current organization and little desire to work toward a full ITAM Program with ITAM-minded, trained, and aligned resources. They are looking to turn the ITSM team into the ITSM/ITAM team with limited support.

[Sara Adams]

I believe we would rate mid to high in most KPA’s.

[Sherrin Richards]

We would do well

[Darnell Sadler]

probably average or below average.

[Nicole McMartin]

I expect that we would do well.

[Bruno Crecca]

1. Procurement = 3
2. Asset ID = 0
3. Comms and EDU = 0
4. Compliance = 0
5. Legislation = 0
6. Disposal = 1
7. Finance = 1
8. Policy = 0
9. Project = 1
10. Vendor = 1

[Eddy Muleme]

Less than 50%

[Cheryl Patton]

Fair

[Alexia Elford]

fairly well, but any feedback to do better would be welcome

[Jay Finucane]

I feel that overall we would score moderately, our ITAM team work well to do our best at meeting the criteria’s we need to. there is always room for improvement.

[Usheda Jackson]

This isn’t a subject I can speak on as I wouldn’t be involved with this assessment. In my opinion I think we would have a high rating.

[Adriene Pickett]

Very good rating for each.

[James Lyons]

1. Acquisition = 3
2. Asset ID = 4
3. Communication & Education = 2
4. Compliance = 3
5. Disposal = 4
6. Documentation = 2
7. Financial = 2
8. Legislation = 1
9. Policy = 2
10. Program = 3
11. Project = 4
12. Vendor = 3

[Ann Martin]

Acquistion- very good
Asset ID – some-what good
Communication & Education- needs to be improved on
Compliance= needs improvement
Legislation- needs improvement
Disposal- needs improvement
Financial- very good
Policy- needs improvement
Project- very good
Vendor- needs improvement
Program- not too bad
Documentation- needs improvement

[Traci Murray]

fail miserablly

[Author]

Posts