Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Needs assessment for my two policy projects:
Policy Review and Update Cycle
Establishing a regular cycle for reviewing and updating ITAM policies is essential for maintaining alignment with evolving business goals, technological advances, and regulatory changes.Policy Effectiveness Metrics
Development and implementation of metrics that measure policy effectiveness is needed to assess the impact of ITAM policies on organizational efficiency and compliance objectively.Opportuniteis for cost savings and ROI improvements in two survey areas:
Improving in technology vendor consolidation provides opportunities streamlined operations, reduced overhead costs, and simplified vendor management, which in turn can enhance negotiation leverage and ensures more cohesive and reliable IT service delivery.
Increased hardware asset leasing can offer greater financial flexibility, allow for more predictable budgeting, and often ensures access to the latest technology without the high upfront costs associated with purchasing.
My organization uses a repository, discovery tool and disposal tracking software. We could probably benefit from metering tools to monitor levels of usage and centralized acquisition tracking software. Our discovery tooling is helpful in identifying license usage, similiar to the license usage applications mentioned in the course materials.
I will focus on:
1) Policy Review and Update Cycle
2) Policy Effectiveness Metrics
because my organization may not have effective routines for these parts of policy managementNo library of templates was provided for this course (and the video was about templates was for the Vendor Management KPA), but I imagine the following templates would be helpful:
– a policy template
– a policy review/update template
– a policy implementation plan template
– a policy communication and training plan template
– a policy exception templateSome strengths of policy management:
– Having the support of security, corporate risk and security groups for interpretation of legislation and related best practices
– Having the support of HR for policy management, learning and resource considerationsSome weaknesses that are challenges to policy management:
– Separating policy rules and procedures clearly, especially in terms of what can be consistently enforced
– Asset types where ITAM workflow starts with identification rather than acquisition, causing issues with full-lifecycle policy rule enforcement
– Ensuring no duplication or conflict among policies and their procedures
– Effective communications to all stakeholdersThe most important roles for the policy Management KPA are:
Policy Manager – maintains the policy and defines its enforcement according to best practices
Legal Department – provides advice on legal and regulatory requirements
Program Manager – provides resources and bridges the policy management personnel to other operations
Security Department – provies guidance on security standards related to ITAM policyOhter key stakeholders in my organization are Corporate Risk Management, who support interpretation of regulations and best practice frameworks, and Corporate Compliance, who support methods of enforcement.
In my organization, some of hte top challenges for improving the Policy Management KPA are:
– staffing constraints and resource expertise in policy management
– standardizing the policy rule language to align with other technology policies
– making enforcement effective, including gaining buy in from stakeholders
– implementing policy rules for areas that are not well controlledThe most critical Policy Management relationships to other KPAs are:
1) Program Management – Policy Management provides the framework and guidelines for the program, while the program provides staffing to the policy KPA
2) Compliance & Legislation – This KPA provides the relationship to the legal and corporate risk departments that can interpret legislation that form the basis of policies, as well as provide the mechanisms for enforcing and tracking enforcement of the policy rules
3) Asset Identification – follows guidelines from the policy on how to identify, track and manage assets from acceptance until they’re ready for disposalAcceptance Process Project:
Given the immediate impact on cost savings and regulatory risk mitigation, the time to act is now to implement enhanced asset acceptance processes, fostering operational efficiency and ensuring adherence to industry standards.Asset ID Tagging Project:
In light of the pressing need to ensure accurate financial reporting and maintain stakeholder trust, immediate action to implement enhanced asset tracking capabilities is essential to mitigate risks and safeguard the organization’s reputation.Acceptance Process Project:
Mitigating the need for returns through enhanced asset acceptance processes will result in cost savings associated with shipping, handling, and restocking.Asset ID Tagging Project:
Enhanced asset tracking capabilities enabled by modernized tagging will enable proactive identification of discrepancies, reducing the risk of inventory shrinkage and ensuring accurate financial reporting.With the project labels on the correct sentences —
Acceptance Process Project:
Improving the asset acceptance process is crucial for ensuring the accurate recording and verification of received assets, facilitating smooth integration into organizational inventory systems.Asset ID Tagging Project:
To address the challenges posed by outdated tagging methods, there is a pressing need to develop and implement a more robust and user-friendly hardware asset tagging system that aligns with industry best practices.Acceptance Process Project:
Enhancing the asset acceptance process will not only ensure accurate asset recording and verification but also minimize the risk of receiving inaccurate deliveries, mitigating the need for returns and fostering smoother operational transitions.Asset ID Tagging Project:
Introducing a more robust hardware asset tagging solution will not only streamline inventory management processes but also enhance security measures, safeguarding valuable assets against loss or theft.Acceptance Process Project:
To address the challenges posed by outdated tagging methods, there is a pressing need to develop and implement a more robust and user-friendly hardware asset tagging system that aligns with industry best practices.Asset ID Tagging Project:
Improving the asset acceptance process is crucial for ensuring the accurate recording and verification of received assets, facilitating smooth integration into organizational inventory systems.Two opportunities for improvement from the self-assessment survey:
1) use of a central request process for software
2) vendor consolidationFocusing on these two areas could increase cost savings and improve ROI by reducing the oppotuntity to select and purchase redundant software for individual lines of business. When software is selected and purchased in silos, even via an RFP process, there is possibility of competing software added to the infrastructure and reduced opportunity for improved pricing based on scale.
