Create and compare an “Is Map” vs. a “Should Map.”

[Kira Bunker]

is happening and should be happening

[Elizabeth Neal]

Is Map: Existing processes and methods, current state of ITAM, SWOT Analysis
Should Map: Future state of ITAM, identify & agree desired improvements, best practices, and goals

[Kenneth Simmons]

Currently what is happening for the company vs what should happen in the future.

[Tyler Stoeger]

current state and future state

[Shavontae Myers]

is Map-shows the current state and assessment of processes and operations

Should map-the alleged state in the way processes and operations should happen

[Heather Waider]

Disposal Management
Is-Map = AID+CMP+POL+VEN+DOC+COM(FIN)
Should-Map = AID+POL(CMP+LEG+VEN)+DOC+COM(PRG+FIN+ACQ)
Assets are identified for disposal and status updated in asset tracker.Devices are erased and software harvested according to Policy. Vendors have been vetted by parent company; however, local Legislation is unknown. LEG should be researched and communicated relularly. Disposal paper work and asset ACQ information is collected and reported to Finance for final retirement. We should have a document repository that links to individual asset history within the organization (from cradle to grave).

[Kim Williams-Matthews]

“Is Map” (current state of itam)vs. a “Should Map”(vision for the future state of itam)

[Sello Leburu]

current and future

[Steven Czubinski]

Is Map – current environment
Should map – direction for the best achievable level / desired goals

[Matthew Yokotake]

Is map: Current state of operations
Should map: Planned state of operations

[Santosh Sridhar]

Current and future state

[Kjetil Skinlo]

N/A.

[Saroj Kumar Mohanty]

current and future

[Warren Herrera]

Is Map: Current State
Should Map: Future/Desired State through revised processes and feature set implementations

[Markus Allen]

Where we are vs Where we want to be

[Author]

Posts