Create and compare an “Is Map” vs. a “Should Map.”

[Whitney Wildeboer]

Is Map: what is currently happening
Should Map: what we are working towards

[Brian Rodrigues]

accusation
Is Map (Current State): Manual process, time-consuming.

Should Map (Ideal State): Automated system, efficient.

Asset Disposal

Is Map (Current State): Manual decommissioning, limited tracking.

Should Map (Ideal State): Automated process, comprehensive tracking.

[Mohamed Hakim]

n/a

[Joey Shadduck]

Current and Future state

[Nina Yavicoli]

current state of affairs including the current processes and roles that are in place would be the “Is Map” and the “Should Map” would elaborate deeper on how we would expand on the current roles and processes we have, along with the addition of new processes

[Renee Larry]

Is Map : current situations
Should Map: ideal outcomes

[angela pesnilyan]

Analysis vs Vision

[Michael Boudreau]

It is difficult for most to map a “is map” program because in the current culture that only rewards accomplishments, accomplishments are celebrated when a minimum viable product is reached. So, embellishments are made even when major dependencies are not committed. Unless an enterprise is committed to provide dedicated resources to specific identified programs without overallocation of the worker resource, then most if not all programs fall under the “should map”.

[Joshua Chen]

Current state vs Future state

[Naomi Diaz]

Is Map-what the current environment, processes, situations are

Should Map-where should we be-where are we going. Roadmaps.

[Author]

Posts