Create and compare an “Is Map” vs. a “Should Map.”

[Charles Pellicane]

current and future maps

[Namrata Parikh]

Current processes versus proposed processes.

[Usheda Jackson]

Is Map is current start and Should Map is where we want to be

[Akshay Mehra]

Software compliance 75% vs software compliance to be a 95%

[Mohd Uzair]

Current framework vs the proposed and more mature framework comprising of policies and procedures fully aligned with global standards.

[Amy Yeung]

Is Map showing the current situation. Should Map showing the ideal situation.

[Nirisha Chalapati]

current state vs ideal state vs future state map

[Sergiu Onofrei]

Current process vs Future process

[Catalina Gavris]

Current state v/s Future state analysis

[Marilena Naftan]

current and future

[Caroline Lovatt]

Current and future (is and Should)

[Adam Garcia]

Is Map = Is a process map that depicts what the current process is versus a Should Map is how the current process should be.

[Henry Davis]

Is Map: Displays the current status of events, procedures, and activities
under contrast, a “Should Map” depicts the conditions under which certain events, activities, or processes should take place.

[John Olotu]

An “Is Map” and a “Should Map” are useful tools for comparing the current state of a process or program (the “Is”) with the ideal or desired future state (the “Should”). In the context of IT Asset Management (ITAM), these maps provide a visual and conceptual way to identify gaps, inefficiencies, and areas for improvement.

[Pedro Lua]

Is Map, focused on asses the ITAM maturity, identifying the strengths, the weaknesses, and the areas for improvement.
Should Map, is the approach for the ITAM model we want to reach, outlining the enhancements, and goals to strive for.

[Author]

Posts